West Virginia Rules DFS Game of Ability; No it’s Not, Says Delaware

Delaware AG Matthew Denn’s opinion it is the fact that DFS is just a not a game of ability. At the very least, it isn’t the way we play it!
Western Virginia and Delaware are two states that do not have plans to legalize fantasy that is daily in the near future, and for two completely different reasons. Two attorneys general, 400 miles apart, have actually demonstrated two different opinions on the legality regarding the contests over the past days that are few.
On Monday, West Virginia’s AG ruled that there was no need to legalize DFS as it ended up being prominently a game of skill and therefore perfectly legal under West Virginia law.
‘We read state legislation to prohibit only betting upon games decided at least predominantly by chance,’ had written Morrisey in his opinion. But DFS, he said ‘are determined predominantly by skill, knowledge, and athletic performance.’
A matter for the legislature whether West Virginia will now move to regulate and tax the DFS industry, as its neighbor Virginia became the first US state to do at the beginning of the year, is of course.
Delaware Pulls the Plug
In stark contrast, Delaware pulled the plug on DFS week that is last with its AG, Matthew Denn, ruling, perhaps more controversially, that the contests were pretty much games of chance.
‘Relying on the Delaware Constitution, as well as State and Federal case law, DOJ attorneys determined that online fantasy contests that involve payment for playing and monetary rewards constitute gambling because chance, compared to skill, could be the dominant aspect in the results of these competitions,’ said Denn.
‘The most participants that are skilled lose and less skilled participants might win because of just what actually takes place during the real-life game. In other terms, real-life players are peoples and human behavior is unpredictable.
‘While it really is recognized that particular individuals may use their respective sports knowledge in selecting their fantasy players and otherwise participating in such contests, that factor alone doesn’t make the contests games of skill.’
Precursor to Regulation?
Denn said that he’d written cease and desist letters to DFS sites operating in Delaware, including DraftKings, FanDuel and Yahoo. There has been no statement that is formal any operator on the matter, nor any indication of whether they mean to comply.
Needless to say, the AG’s ruling would not preclude the legislature from passing a law to legalize and control DFS in the foreseeable future; indeed, similar rulings from DA’s in other states have shown become a catalyst for the passing such legislation, as was the case in Tennessee and Mississippi earlier this year.
A bill to regulate DFS was introduced in the Delaware House at zero hour at the end of the legislative session on 30 June, but could was too late be pushed through.
‘We are certain that numerous Delaware residents and visitors would enjoy participating into the full array of fantasy recreations contests, including those that require payment for participation and have cash honors,’ concluded Genn. ‘But until such contests can legally be offered, the DOJ must enforce the legislation.’
RAWA Champion Chaffetz Grills AG Lynch, While Sanders Shocks with Clinton Endorsement
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) was back at it on Capitol Hill this week, as the congressman continues to demand answers concerning the FBI’s recommendation to your Department of Justice (DOJ) not to prosecute Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton.
On July 6, FBI Director James Comey stated Clinton’s usage of a private email server while serving as secretary of state ended up being careless, but don’t justify unlawful fees.
US Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) seen here at an earlier hearing with the FBI’s James Comey, grilled AG Loretta Lynch at a House Judiciary Commitee hearing on Tuesday in regards to the legalities surrounding Hillary Clinton’s claims about her personal email server usage. Lynch largely avoided taking any stance whatsoever, visibly irritating Chaffetz. Representative Elijah Cummings (D- Maryland) sits to Chaffetz’ right. (Image: J. Scott Applewhite/AP)
Chaffetz is Las Vegas Sands Chairman Sheldon Adelson’s right-hand man in Congress. The representative introduced the Restoration of America’s Wire Act (RAWA) in the House to coincide with Sen. Lindsey Graham’s (R-South Carolina) legislation in the Senate.
RAWA seeks to displace the Wire Act to its pre-2011 interpretation. Five years ago, the DOJ issued an opinion saying the Wire Act applied only to online sports wagering, effectively opening states to legalize Web casinos.
Chaffetz believes the DOJ had no right to unilaterally overhaul federal law. He also doesn’t believe the division is being candid in how it is responding to Comey’s findings.
Pleading the Fifth
The morning after his agency recommended no charges against Clinton for storing emails that are classified non-secure servers, Comey came across aided by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, of which Chaffetz is the chairman.
Although he did not have the blissful luxury of as much interview time as he did with Comey, Chaffetz did their best to take full advantageous asset of the five minutes he’d with Attorney General Loretta Lynch on Tuesday. As AG, Lynch is technically Comey’s boss, since the FBI is just a division associated with DOJ.
But Lynch deflected one question after another, much to the chagrin of the Utah congressman. The AG avoided giving answers that are specific Chaffetz’ ongoing attack of ‘can it be legal or illegal?’
‘ Is it illegal or legal to fairly share classified information with somebody who doesn’t have a security approval?’ the congressman asked Lynch. ‘Is it legal or illegal to deliver access to an individual who doesn’t have the security that is requisite to view classified material? Can it be appropriate or illegal to keep, house, or retain classified information in a non-secure location?’
When Lynch regularly and repeatedly referred him to ‘statutes’ to clarify the legal standing on any of these dilemmas, Chaffetz’ frustration was abundant and unhidden.
‘The shortage of clarity you give to this body is pretty that is stunnin . . My time has expired, I wish I had about 20 more minutes,’ he noted.
Sanders Endorses Clinton
With all the email scandal ( at the very least legitimately) behind her, Hillary Clinton has now gotten the nod that is official her former nemesis in Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.
‘Secretary Clinton has won the nomination that is democratic’ Sanders said in New Hampshire, standing alongside the former secretary of state and First Lady. ‘I mean to do everything I can to make certain she will be the next president of the United States.’
Republican nominee Donald Trump countered the announcement by straight away releasing an advertisement highlighting the various times Sanders said Clinton was unfit become president.
Bush and Obama Unite, for One Brief Shining Minute
Meanwhile, a bondibet casino online moment that is rare of between your political events emerged on July 12 in Dallas. During a memorial service for the slain police officers ambushed on July 7, President Barack Obama and former President George W. Bush came together in an attempt to honor those killed by a crazed anti-law, anti-white gunman in a sniper attack
Obama told mourners, ‘As Americans, we are able to decide that people like this killer will fail ultimately. They shall not drive us apart. We can opt to come together and work out our country reflect the nice inside us, the hopes and simple dreams we share.’
Before Obama, Bush talked about the selflessness of police officers everywhere.
‘Most of us that is amazing if the minute called we would risk our lives to protect a spouse or a child,’ the former president said for it. ‘Those wearing the uniform assume that danger for the safety of strangers [at all times].’
Further feedback about gun control and also the Black Lives question movement through the service from Obama received critique from some segments, nevertheless, with numerous saying it absolutely was not the place that is right time and energy to address politically loaded issues.
Pennsylvania Online Gambling Bill Shelved Until Legislature Reconvenes This Autumn
Billionaire and anti-Internet gambling proponent Sheldon Adelson is likely pleased to learn Pennsylvania online gambling is being delayed until at least the fall. (Image: Associated Press/ haaretz.com)
Pennsylvania online gambling has been pushed apart in Harrisburg until the fall. That’s the unfortunate outcome for iGambling proponents after lawmakers within the Keystone State labored over gambling expansion legislation for the final several months.
At 12:01 am on July 12, Governor Tom Wolf (D) allowed a budget that is bipartisan to become law without their signature. The $31.5 billion spending blueprint shall increase shelling out for education and provide resources to combat their state’s heroin epidemic.
The issue that is primary how exactly to pay for it. Depending on who’s counting, the appropriations bill produces a $1-2 billion shortfall.
Largely pushed by Republicans within the General Assembly, gambling expansion has been seen as one perfect untapped resource that could help pay for the plan. However the legislature is anticipated to adjourn for the summer and not sometime reconvene until this fall.
Gambling on Hold
Led by State Rep. John Payne (R-District 106), the gambling expansion under consideration might have authorized off-track betting facilities and airports to house slot machines, regulate fantasy that is daily (DFS), and legalize on line gambling.
Current casinos that are land-based be the only ones permitted to supply Internet gambling. Licenses were expected to price operators $8 million, with gross gaming revenues taxed at 16 percent.
‘Regulating and taxing interactive video gaming in Pennsylvania is a viable option that could benefit the state and our communities,’ Payne said in late June. ‘Before we ask the taxpayers to fork over more of their hard-earned money, we must consider innovative revenue sources to fill our budget shortfall and keep our public pension system solvent.’
Gambling certainly won’t overcome the gap that is billion-dollar but it would help.
Lawmakers estimate $100 million could be created for Harrisburg in the year that is first mainly due to upfront licensing fees. This means five to 10 percent associated with the budget space might be solved through gambling expansion.
State leaders will also be targeting an extra $1 tax on each pack of cigarettes sold, imposing a six tax that is percent digital entertainment downloads, and overhauling the state-run wine industry to allow private merchants to enter the market.
Spend Now, Spend Later
Anyone with credit cards knows essential it really is to cover on time. Unfortunately for residents in Pennsylvania, their leaders that are electedn’t as financially versed.
State Sen. Pat Browne (R-District 16), president of the state’s Senate Appropriations Committee, says action shall be forthcoming.
‘One hundred million dollars into the scope of the $31.5 billion budget . . . it isn’t required right away,’ Browne told the Philadelphia Inquirer. The Lehigh County senator added, but, that the likelihood of online gambling being reconsidered this fall are ‘probable.’
Wolf was justly upset that the General Assembly did not send him a calculated method to spend for the budget.
‘The General Assembly has a responsibility that is constitutional pass a sustainable revenue package to purchase what they desire to spend,’ Wolf said this week. ‘We owe it to taxpayers, our youngsters, seniors, and our many vulnerable to bring this across the finish line.’
Quebec ISP Blocking Challenged by Federal Consumer Rights Group
Quebec’s plan to block online gambling internet site faces a challenge that it is in direct conflict with federal law. (Image: gamingintelligence.com)
Quebec’s plans to force ISP’s to block access to unlicensed gambling is being put to the test by a federal consumer rights group. The Public Interest Advocacy Centre (PIAC) this week filed an objection up to a legislation, passed by the Quebec legislature earlier in the year, which aims to disconnect 8.2 million residents from the unregulated markets.
The bill’s supporters declare that its aim is to ‘improve general public health’ by forcing state residents to play on Quebec’s sole regulated online gaming site, Lotto-Quebec’s Espace-jeux.
But critics, which include net neutrality advocates, technology attorneys, and also the ISPs themselves, have accused the Quebec federal government of establishing a dangerous precedent by putting commercial gain above the freedom associated with the internet. The plans, that have been drawn up in the provinces March 2015 budget anticipate the scheme will boost government revenues by $13.5 million in 2016-2017 and $27 million in subsequent years.
Expense to Consumers
These gains will come at the huge expense of ISP companies, that have said that the disruption to their infrastructures would be enormous as they could have to redesign their companies from the ground up. The price of this is passed onto consumers.
The PIAC filing states that Quebec is in direct conflict with the1993 Federal Telecommunications Act, which prohibits a communications provider from ‘control[ing] the information or influence[ing] the meaning or intent behind telecommunications carried unless it has approval from the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission by it for the public.
Recent Comments